|
Simi
Valley, CA
December 6-10, 2010
Discount Available
Until October 29th
VIEW DETAILS
|
|
Motivating Executives
to Fund Enhancements to IT Controls
By Gordon Smith (July 2010)
Download
PDF of article at www.canaudit.com/Perspectives/Volume11-Issue5.pdf
I am often puzzled by
Management’s reaction to major IT audit issues we discover.
In most cases, they tolerate them. Even when we gain administrative
access to the Windows domain and discover serious control issues,
they do not demand remediation efforts. These issues may include
2,000 unpatched machines, 300 accounts with missing or simplistic
passwords, and uncontrolled two-way trust relationships. Management
seems concerned, but not enough to do anything.
So what makes Management jump out of their seats to begin
remediation? When we take the administrative access we have
gained a few steps further and demonstrate what can be done
with the access gained. The most effective demonstrations are
accessing executive email, BlackBerry phones and documents,
and discovering malware and remote control software on the
internal network.
Let us start with email. With domain administrative access
typically achieved during the project timeframe and the email
server connected to the domain, we usually have access to executive
email. This includes the ability to send or delete email from
an executive account. This usually gets Management realizing
why we auditors have been advocating a reduction in the number
of people with domain-wide administrative access. What also
gets their attention is showing them that we can view, alter
or delete their address book. All of their contacts can be
destroyed or copied by anyone with administrative access to
the exchange or email server.
Next we move on to the executive BlackBerry phones. If the
BlackBerry server is poorly configured and part of the Windows
domain, we can administer all of the organization’s BlackBerry
phones. Imagine Management’s reaction when they realize
with the domain access gained, we can now disable their BlackBerry
just as an administrator would do if it were lost. We can also
alter the email account sending and receiving mail from the
BlackBerry. This means we could send the lawyer’s email
to the executive or the executive’s email to the lawyer
or to anyone else, say a member of the press or some dissident
shareholders. While we do not actually do this, we can prove
the ability to do it.
Next we go to either their shared drive or that of their Administrative
Assistant. We show them that we have access to browse, copy,
alter or delete their documents. Again, we do no harm, but
showing that we can, demonstrates a risk they may not have
considered.
Our next step is to use our administrative access to find
machines running malware. When we demonstrate that malware
and other Trojans are on machines in the internal network,
Management understands the risk. More often than not, their
first question is why we were able to identify them and their
IT or security department did not. The answer is simply because
we looked. Many times, IT and security staff rely wholly on
their anti-virus and anti-malware software and do not look
for malware instances within their network. To be thorough,
they should be scanning and testing all machines within the
network several times a day.
Last but not least, we check for remote control software.
I have talked about LogMeIn and similar products in my past
newsletters. Let me emphasize again that these products create
a pathway into your network for users who know the related
account and password. In our Windows audit segment, we check
for and often find these products running on the inside of
the network. When we provide Management a demonstration of
how these products can jeopardize security if not properly
controlled, they want to remediate this issue immediately.
Some of our competitors say we use scare tactics. This is
not the case. We provide valid examples of control weaknesses
that Executives and Senior Management can understand. They
understand when their command and control structure can be
disrupted and when BlackBerry phones and email are compromised.
They understand when their confidential or secret documents
can be disclosed, altered or destroyed. They understand when
malware and remote control software compromise their networks.
Using concrete examples of the effects of control weaknesses,
they finally comprehend why controls need to be improved and
with such a high priority.
Once Executives truly understand the risk, they are willing
to finance investments in control enhancement. In addition,
they want to see immediate progress. Several of our clients
request follow-up mini audits every quarter to ensure IT and
security staff are focusing on improvements and succeeding.
While this puts extra pressure on the staff, it is necessary.
As an auditor, I do not appreciate SSDD (same stuff, different
date) audits. I like to see continuous improvement. Unfortunately,
on several of our first and second tests following an IT Security
Baseline or Penetration Audit, we do not see much change. Once
this lack of progress is reported to Management, improvements
are made. This common scenario demonstrates the need for Executive
awareness and Senior Management involvement in the remediation
process.
As many of you know, I love sharing our techniques with the
audit and security community. The best way to transfer this
type of knowledge and skill is hands-on training. Because of
this, we are pleased to have one or two of the client’s
staff sit and work alongside us as we conduct our audits in
order to observe our techniques. We truly believe that skills
transfer is the best way to improve client security. Once we
leave, the client is equipped to do the follow-up work required
to evaluate the remediation process.
If you are interested in more information concerning our Windows
Security Assessments, Network Penetration Audits or IT Security
Baselines, please contact Tamra at Tamra@canaudit.com.
As always, the opinions
in this article are mine and mine alone. Please send me your
comments, both positive and negative, to Gordon@canaudit.com.
Canaudit specializes in
a variety of information system and technology audits, ranging
from periodic network penetration testing to full network and
operating system security review. Our tailored audits provide
an objective, disciplined, and in-depth analysis to evaluate
and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control and
security within your organization’s technological environment.
For interest in Canaudit
to perform an IT audit for your organization, please email
Tamra at Tamra@canaudit.com,
or call (805) 583-3723.
Canaudit
provides training for IIA and ISACA chapters, in-house
training for corporations as well as public training
for all to attend. Our variety of courses offers training
appropriate for introductory level employees all the
way up to management. Attendees are awarded 8 CPE credits
per day.
A list of our available
courses, course descriptions and outlines can be found at www.canaudit.com/course.html.
For more information on upcoming public training and
to register, visit www.canaudit.com/seminars.html.
For more information or to schedule an event, please
email Brenna at Brenna@canaudit.com,
or call (805) 583-3723.
|